This is a sponsored post, but I assure you the opinions and text are my own.
I have been asked to write a little about the differences between Krill Oil and Fish Oil, which is better for you? Since I am a daily popper of the gigantic Fish Oil pills, I figured it would be good to look into this debate. I have been taking Fish Oil supplements for years, and I buy products that have DHA and Omega 3's added for my daughter. So, I guess you could say I have bought into the idea that Fish Oils are beneficial to your health hook line and sinker!
By this point we pretty much all know that DHA is necessary for healthy brain development, Omega 3 Fatty Acids are beneficial for regulating cholesterol levels and improving heart health, and that our skin and waistlines even benefit from the addition of these healthy oils. Both Krill oil and Fish oil contain these beneficial elements, so where do the differences in proposed benefits begin?
From what I have read, the major difference between regular Fish Oil and Krill Oil is that Krill Oil contains higher levels of an antioxidant called Astaxanthin which is able to cross the blood-brain barrier thereby carrying it's beneficial antioxidants into the brain reducing the amount of free radicals and protecting the eyes, brain, and central nervous system from potential damage.
The second difference proponents of Krill Oil are pushing is that Krill Oil contains fewer contaminants like mercury and other toxins than standard Fish Oils do. This is mainly due to the fact that Krill is fished from cooler climates, further away from major sources of pollution. Fish Oil defenders, however, remind us that no place on our beautiful planet is truly free of pollutants, especially airborne pollution, and claim that good Fish Oils are decontaminated prior to use, whereas Krill Oil is not decontaminated. Of course, we have seen some of the techniques the food industry employs to "decontaminate" our food are pretty suspect themselves, for example they use ammonia to decontaminate hamburger...yuck. So, personally I would rather have a product that requires less processing naturally than one that has to undergo complicated decontamination procedures to make it safe.
On a purely cosmetic side, Krill Oil is also supposed to be less "fishy". I know a lot of people complain they get a nasty fish taste and get fishy burps when taking Fish Oil supplements. Krill Oil is supposed to eliminate this nasty side effect.
One major downside of Krill Oil for me is the price. It can be significantly more expensive than the standard fish oil, but proponents will tell you it's worth it. If you have more questions you can check out this site http://krilloil.com/fish-oil-vs-krill-oil.html.
I would be curious to know whether any of my readers have done a comparison for themselves. Let me know what you think!
I have been asked to write a little about the differences between Krill Oil and Fish Oil, which is better for you? Since I am a daily popper of the gigantic Fish Oil pills, I figured it would be good to look into this debate. I have been taking Fish Oil supplements for years, and I buy products that have DHA and Omega 3's added for my daughter. So, I guess you could say I have bought into the idea that Fish Oils are beneficial to your health hook line and sinker!
By this point we pretty much all know that DHA is necessary for healthy brain development, Omega 3 Fatty Acids are beneficial for regulating cholesterol levels and improving heart health, and that our skin and waistlines even benefit from the addition of these healthy oils. Both Krill oil and Fish oil contain these beneficial elements, so where do the differences in proposed benefits begin?
From what I have read, the major difference between regular Fish Oil and Krill Oil is that Krill Oil contains higher levels of an antioxidant called Astaxanthin which is able to cross the blood-brain barrier thereby carrying it's beneficial antioxidants into the brain reducing the amount of free radicals and protecting the eyes, brain, and central nervous system from potential damage.
The second difference proponents of Krill Oil are pushing is that Krill Oil contains fewer contaminants like mercury and other toxins than standard Fish Oils do. This is mainly due to the fact that Krill is fished from cooler climates, further away from major sources of pollution. Fish Oil defenders, however, remind us that no place on our beautiful planet is truly free of pollutants, especially airborne pollution, and claim that good Fish Oils are decontaminated prior to use, whereas Krill Oil is not decontaminated. Of course, we have seen some of the techniques the food industry employs to "decontaminate" our food are pretty suspect themselves, for example they use ammonia to decontaminate hamburger...yuck. So, personally I would rather have a product that requires less processing naturally than one that has to undergo complicated decontamination procedures to make it safe.
On a purely cosmetic side, Krill Oil is also supposed to be less "fishy". I know a lot of people complain they get a nasty fish taste and get fishy burps when taking Fish Oil supplements. Krill Oil is supposed to eliminate this nasty side effect.
One major downside of Krill Oil for me is the price. It can be significantly more expensive than the standard fish oil, but proponents will tell you it's worth it. If you have more questions you can check out this site http://krilloil.com/fish-oil-vs-krill-oil.html.
I would be curious to know whether any of my readers have done a comparison for themselves. Let me know what you think!
